Body camera funding from Washington D.C., would be much appreciated, according to police departments on the other side of the "Welcome to South Carolina" sign.
But some law enforcement agencies still have concerns that the technology is viewed, by some, as the deciding factor in determining the outcome of an incident or case.
The latest piece of Congressional legislation in support of body cameras came last week from the Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C.
Scott introduced the Safer Officers and Safer Citizens Act, a response to the string of deaths in which unarmed black men have been killed by white police officers. This includes the death of Walter Scott, a 50-year-old North Charleston black man who lived in Sen. Scott's district.
Walter Scott was killed on April 4 in a police shooting by North Charleston officer Michael Slager.
An eyewitness caught the incident on video with his cellphone, pushing Sen. Scott and others to back body camera footage to enhance safety for officers and citizens.
'We'll take it'
In June, Gov. Nikki Haley signed a Senate bill that requires police agencies to have their officers wear body cameras and create a policy for which officers will wear them, when they should and should not be recording, and how videos are stored.
During deliberations on the bill earlier this year, Lt. Jake Mahoney of the Aiken Department of Public Safety said the department has an estimate of close to $70,000 a year to maintain the cameras and the data that will need to be stored.
Mahoney said then that the department would gladly take any outside funding that would help officers pay for cameras and their upkeep.
Following Scott's proposal, Mahoney's message has not changed.
"One of the challenges with integrating a program is the funding. So whether that funding comes from local sources, state funds or federal funds, we'll gladly accept any help we can get with funding," Mahoney said.
Scott's bill includes a requirement for agencies to match any funding they receive by at least 25 percent, a number Mahoney said is "more than fair."
"We've participated in many programs that require matching funds at different percentages. So it's not unreasonable to agree to provide some of the funds," Mahoney said.
Working out the kinks
Burnettown is one of the many small towns in the state and country that could potentially use outside funding sources to pay for the technology.
Chief David Smith said he is in support of the cameras but said a misconception exists that body cameras should be the final say in the outcome of a case.
Simply put, Smith said body cameras are a great resource, but "you're not going to see everything. Sometimes the camera sees things I didn't see, and sometimes I see things the camera didn't pick up," he said.
He added that cameras could fall off during a scuffle, and there are some residents who would accuse police of snatching them off purposefully.
Other issues Smith and Mahoney mentioned are the stipulations of when to wear body cameras and how long data footage should be stored.
Those issues would likely be left up to the states as, according to Scott's proposal, preferential consideration will be given to departments who have a comprehensive policy developed in consultation with criminal justice experts and community members.
For that reason, agencies across the state attended a meeting with S.C. State Law Enforcement Division on Monday, Mahoney said.
The meeting served as an open forum on challenges that come with fully implementing the technology.
With data storage, for example, Smith said data from a case based on a situation from 2012 may become relevant in 2015.
"Should we store data that long?" he asked. "There are just a lot of moving factors and associated costs with body cameras; so while they are a great asset that we support, there's also some things that need to be worked out with their implementation."
Mahoney agreed there are several factors to consider when drafting legislation and moving to incorporate the technology statewide; however, he said, Aiken Public Safety is on board.
"We are actively engaged on seeking the best fit for our department and state and looking forward to getting to appoint where we can fully implement them," Mahoney said.
Recap of the numbers
The Safer Officers and Safer Citizens Act would stream $100 million each year for the next five years into a fund for agencies who need help purchasing cameras that range between $800 and $1,000 per camera.
Scott said funding for the cameras would come by adjusting regulations regarding paid administrative leave across the federal government. Specifically, the body cam legislation would limit paid administrative leave for an employee to no more than 20 days a year, unless personally approved by the agency head.
"About 97 percent of the time, folks who take administrative leave use fewer than 20 days," Scott said. "That savings (in paid administrative leave) is in excess of $100 million per year."
Derrek Asberry is the SRS beat reporter for the Aiken Standard.